Wednesday, 19 February 2014

The Decline & Fall of the English Language



The Queen Victoria monument-London


   The Decline & Fall of the English Language

By


Chris Green



The history of the English language has its roots in the arrival of three Germanic tribes who invaded Britain during the 5th century AD. These tribes, the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes, crossed the North Sea from what today is Denmark and northern Germany. At that time the inhabitants of Britain spoke a Celtic language. But most of the native Celtic speakers were pushed west and north by the invaders into what is now Wales, Scotland and Ireland. The Angles came from "Englaland" [sic] and their language was called "Englisc" - from whence the words "England" and "English" are derived. 

Christ Church -Oxford
 The English language has three distinct historical categories with the latter having two sub-categories: Old English (450-1100 AD), Middle English (1100-1500) and Modern English (1500-1800). The sub-categories are therefore Early Modern English (1500-1800) and Late Modern English (1800-present day). A further sub-category has evolved within the last twenty years which has yet to be given a title, a matter which may be resolved by the end of this column which will draw attention to the steep decline and fall of the standards of both written and spoken English in Great Britain and England in particular, today in 2014.

The flag of St George-Patron Saint of England


To develop the ultimate point, let us look in more detail at the development of Modern English. Towards the end of Middle English, a sudden and distinct change in pronunciation (the Great Vowel Shift) started, with vowels being pronounced shorter and shorter. From the 16th century the British had contact with many peoples from around the world. This, and the Renaissance of Classical learning, meant that many new words and phrases entered the language. The invention of printing also meant that there was now a common language in print. Books became cheaper to buy and more and more people learned to read. Printing also brought standardization to English:Spelling and grammar became fixed, and the dialect of London, where most publishing houses were, became the standard. In 1604 the first English dictionary was published. 

An old map of England & Wales
 The main difference between Early Modern English and Late Modern English is vocabulary. Late Modern English has many more words, arising from two principal factors: firstly, the Industrial Revolution and technology created a need for new words; secondly, the British Empire at its height covered one quarter of the earth's surface, and the English language adopted foreign words from many countries. But as with any country in the world, England has myriad local dialects which employ colloquialisms and these have added to the overall richness of the language, however with greater social mobility and the quantum leap in telecommunication, dialects have softened greatly during the course of the last 30 years or so.




From around 1600, the English colonization of North America resulted in the creation of a distinct American variety of English. Some English pronunciations and words "froze" when they reached America. In some ways, American English is more like the English of Shakespeare than modern British English is. Some expressions that the British call "Americanisms" are in fact original British expressions that were preserved in the colonies while lost for a time in Britain (for example trash for rubbish, loan as a verb instead of lend, and fall for autumn; another example, frame-up, was re-imported into Britain through Hollywood gangster movies). Spanish also had an influence on American English (and subsequently British English), with words like canyon, ranch, stampede and vigilante being examples of Spanish words that entered English through the settlement of the American West. French words (through Louisiana) and West African words (through the slave trade) also influenced American English (and so, to an extent, British English).

The historical City of Bath

Today, American English is particularly influential, due to the USA's dominance of cinema, television, popular music, trade and technology (including the Internet). But there are many other varieties of English around the world, including for example Australian English, New Zealand English, Canadian English, South African English, Indian English and Caribbean English.



The English language has evolved as all modern-day languages must evolve but there can be no doubt at all that the standard of English has fallen steeply even during the last ten years although this may have begun earlier still. With the advent and development of mobile telephones and social media based communications, the written word has become badly abbreviated to form what has become known as 'text language' and involves the mixing up of consonants and numerals. For example 'mate' becomes m8; 'see you tomorrow' becomes 'c u tomoz'. And so it goes on to the extent that some schools are no longer correcting their students for adopting 'text-ese' within their written work and it could even be suggested that their teachers use the same awful 'dumbed-down' English that their students have learned.
Durham Cathedral



It is also very clear – if unintelligible – to this columnist at least, that the standard of conversational English has and continues, to steeply decline. One only has to listen to peoples conversations today to understand this point. For example a typical exchange between two people might go like this:



I'm tellin ya like, I was standing there literally and I`m like OH MY GOD and its like, you know what I mean, literally (lit-ra-lee) I dint know what to do!” which is likely to elicit a reply along the lines of “Oh My God (which would be written O mi god) that appened to me, like literally happened to me!” And so the conversation would continue, unintelligibly but nonetheless entirely satisfactorily to the participants thereof. Colloquialisms are one thing, but 'Estuary ' and/or other forms of 'dumbed-down' English today serve to diminish the country as a whole. 

Another noticeable change in the spoken language is that people now have a tendency to employ the use of a rising cadence at the end of sentences which implies a form of 'questioning' within their statement even if they are not actually asking a question, or that by doing so, they give emphasis to whatever it is they are trying to say. This influence is again partly American but also antipodean in origin too. Another pet hate [of the writer] is those who approach a bar or servery counter and order whatever it is they wish with the aphorism "Can I get..." as distinct to the correct manner which is "Please may I have or May I have..." It is absolutely awful and it is NOT correct English either!





Foreign immigrants are expected to learn English as part and parcel of their citizenship and rightly so, but one envisions an aspiring citizen who might take their birth and infant nurture from the Far East ending up speaking in a 'like' manner but with peculiarities due to their accents. For example: “Excuse me, could you give me 'rike' directions to 'der' station, please 'rike' (like)” And so it could go on and of course, a degree of exaggeration is being employed here to make the point however far more seriously, in the world of business, a whole new language has evolved which could be described as 'Office-ese' and comprises partly of inane nonsense that is punctuated with acronyms. If you are not conversant with the acronyms employed, you are effectively excluded from the entire process; it has recently become the practice of this writer to bemoan OUA's when he finds himself in such situations. This usually elicits the enquiry “What are OUA's?” To which the blunt reply erupts in a stridently Oxford English accent thus: “ OVER USE of ACRONYMS!” 

Chester Cathedral



One only has to review BBC news bulletins during the past half a century to gain an understanding of how the spoken, let alone written form of English has changed and the American influence is as marked as it is malign in terms of the tendency to lower and diminish the standard thereof. Looking forward, one is filled with much foreboding as to what might unfold during the ensuing years in relation to what the shape of our rich language might in the future take. But the English language has been used to communicate the works of some of the worlds finest minds, writers and poets throughout the whole world from time immemorial. It would indeed be a tragedy for future generations if this language became extinct.

"I have travelled amongst unknown men
In lands beyond the sea.
Nor England! Did I know 'till then
What love I bore to thee."

Wm Wordsworth 

Beşparmak Media Services





Thursday, 6 February 2014

“Tower-Contractor 1 EXPEDITE!” More runways tales

Tower-Contractor 1 EXPEDITE!”

More runways tales...



In the recently published articles entitled, “Airport Tales” and “Mayday. Mayday” - Airport memories 25 years on- the writer has drawn upon personal, hands-on experience to share with readers aspects of airport maintenance that are not usually in the public domain, together with some anecdotes that are entirely unique. This is not for any purpose of self- aggrandisement, it is simply that few have made the transition from a Highways and Airport maintenance related career to that of writing, the latter proving to be a wonderful medium wherewith to share memories that would otherwise be lost as time unfolds. This particular article is likely however, to be the last such piece but even if this proves to be so, only snap-shots of the 'behind the curtain' world of 'live' airport maintenance are revealed.

One of the biggest headaches that airport operators face in relation to aircraft safety relates to the maintenance of runway skid resistance values (SRV's). Runways are constructed and laid-out to provide for reciprocal operations and therefore have two thresholds and two areas known as TDZ's or Touch-Down Zones; this is due to the fact that aircraft take off and land into the wind, rather than with the wind behind or across the aircraft for the purpose of maximising aerodynamic 'lift'. A TDZ is typically 500 metres in length and full runway width, however the predominant area of concentration is 10 metres either side of the localiser (centre-line) by 500 metres (or longer) in length.

When an aircraft lands, a number of functions occur simultaneously or very close to simultaneously; let us imagine a Boeing 747 for this example. Approaching at around 160-180 knots, in full landing flap configuration with landing gear extended, at the point of touch-down the nose comes up and the aircraft settles down; as the main landing cart (all 16 wheels) locks down, the anti-lift flaps or spoilers deploy dumping the mass of the aircraft onto those huge wheels whilst on touch-down, the flight management systems initiate a one-touch-2 second braking moment whilst the aircraft engines are placed into reverse-trust mode. This, together with supplementary braking, causes a considerable amount of rubber to be laid down in the touch-down zones which has the effect, in due time, to substantially occlude runway surface texture and skid resistance values fall accordingly. Readers may recall from the article which recalled anecdotes from Damascus in 1999, that the full length of the runways had become compromised by rubber deposits as aircraft had become forced to land deeper and deeper due to SRV occlusion. In fact, a KLM pilot confided to the writer at the time, that were they to encounter rain at Damascus, a diversion to Beirut would have been inevitable on grounds of safety!

An example of Captive Hydrology removing rubber deposits. This was not the actual machine as used on the project concerned.

There are various ways of solving the problem of rubber build-up and the removal thereof, but most involve the closure of a runway which is inevitably costly and time consuming with operational penalties adding to the headache. One of the most effective in terms of time and cost and because there is no requirement to close runways is the use of Captive Hydrology. This is a one-vehicle, one-pass completed process which combines the use of very high water pressure and powerful vacuuming to recover the water and rubber debris. This also has the added benefit of removing FOD'S (foreign object debris) simultaneously. The writer was a one of the pioneers of the technique in airport operations, as a matter of interest.

RAF Brize Norton: Rubber deposits can be picked out from this view.


At RAF Brize-Norton in 2001, we had been tasked to carry out a rubber removal operation during a continuous process at a weekend. 22000 square metres had to be cleaned during what we understood was a 'closed runway' regime and in theory, this would be relatively straight-forward. Where things went wrong was, that on arrival at the control tower for a pre-works briefing, it became 'fairly clear' that the runway was anything but 'closed'. The first hint of which being when this columnist, a VHF licensed RT operator, was handed a radio and call signs were agreed (Contractor 1). The RAF runway was fully-operational this weekend after all! But with Captive Hydrology, we can shut down and vacate a runway leaving it safe to function within minutes and so typically, ATC can call up with something like the following:

Contractor 1-Tower: Traffic inbound 6 miles longs; vacate runway”

Tower-Contractor 1: roger that: Vacate runway”

(Sometimes the instruction would include the perhaps euphemistic verb 'expedite'!)

RAF C-17 Globemaster III


But our Austrian operator (Hans) and 'yours truly' got on with things and during the night, we were treated to a variety of military comings and goings interspersed with 'tower-contractor' banter over the VHF radio with no small amount of humour being spared, all of which served to make the night-day shift all the more bearable. But inevitably, something had to go awry; at one point, a call came into vacate, but the call was not heard [this can happen] in which case ATC resorted to a 'highly technical' back-up procedure which basically involved flashing the runway edge lights! EXPEDITE! Barking ones instructions to Hans who panicked, he was unable to get the machine out of operational gear (hydrostatic) so we were limited to 10 KPH forward travel! We nevertheless vacated but the aircraft (a Boeing 757-200 charter plane) then proceeded to follow us down the RET (rapid exit taxiway) en route to stand. 'Hansie' could see the aircraft right up behind us to the extent that once again, 'eye lids were batting at both ends of his physiology', whilst RT banter between ATC, the 757 pilot and 'yours truly' was hilarious! When we were finally able to turn off and the aircraft revved up and passed us, there was a moment of various lights being flashed (by the 757) and time honoured hand signals between the first officer and this columnist who, as he pens this memoir, is grinning and chuckling, 13 years on!

Given the enhanced nature of on-site operational requirements, the pair of us opted to work through without a break and successfully completed our operations in 18 hours (phew). On completion, the writer signalled ATC thus:

Tower -contractor 1. All TDZ operations fully complete and runway vacated. The runway is yours and incidentally, many thanks for the air-show.”

Back came the reply:

Contractor 1- Tower. Many thanks; we aim to please!”

There followed our usual de-brief in SATCO's office much of which cannot be related here, however whilst our respective standard requirements were seen through to the letter, the humour was almost aerobatic.

Live runway maintenance operations involve very high levels of planning and concentration on all sides of the contractual relation with all parties being devoted to our mutual primary duty, that of safe airport operations. In 36 years of combined Highway and Airport maintenance works, never was so much fun, happiness and exhilaration gained, from the most dangerous and critically important operations and locations as was gleaned from airport operations at home and overseas, and these will never be forgotten by this now seemingly 'grounded' columnist.




By

Chris Green

 Beşparmak Media Services